Wednesday, April 5, 2017

Rahm's Insane Plan

Just a reminder that it's not just Republicans who have insane ideas about education. Rahm Emanuel, former Obamabro and current mayor of at least some parts of Chicago has unleashed this genius idea, as covered by CBS today:


“We live in a period of time where you earn what you learn,” Emanuel said. “The school system of K through 12 is not applicable to the world and the economy and the world that our high school students are graduating to. So we’re moving to a pre-K to college model.”

Under the proposal, all Chicago Public School students starting with this year’s freshman class would have to show an acceptance letter to a four-year university, a community college, a trade school or apprenticeship, an internship, or a branch of the armed services in order to receive their high school diploma.

That's it-- Choose college, trade school, internship, or military, or else Rahm will hold your diploma hostage.

Janice Jackson, CEO of Chicago Public Schools, pointed out that any student who graduates from CPS is automatically accepted into the City College community college program. So I suppose we could see this not as a draconian, one-size-fits-all intrusion on the lives of young adults and instead see it as a really, really aggressive recruiting program for the City Colleges.

Or maybe just an aggressive recruiting program for Chicagoland charter schools.

My mind is still reeling from trying to compile the full list of life paths that Rahm Emanuel has now declared Not Good Enough.

Steady job that's not a trade? Working musician? Stay-at-home mom? Person who just needs to spend a year or two working at a crappy minimum wage job while they figure out what they want to do next? Manage the family business? All of that and more have passed through my classroom and gone on to successful, productive, happy lives. Are you telling me we shouldn't have given them a diploma because they didn't do what we wanted them to after graduation?

Nor do I imagine for one Chicago Second that wealthy parents whose children are not ready for or aimed at one of these four choices while they are still high school seniors-- those parents are going to say, "Oh, well, then. I guess you don't get a diploma. Them's the breaks." No-- this is one more numbskulled reformy idea that wealthy parents would not tolerate for a single second. Now, there are exemptions for incarcerated students-- maybe there will also be exemptions for trust fund students. This is one more reform aimed at Those People's Children, because Those People's Children really need to be pushed in the correct direction.

Is it valuable and worthwhile for students to be nudged and encouraged to think about life after high school? Absolutely. Should we hold their diploma's hostage unless they comply with our demands for only approved choices in their future-- not only comply with our demands, but do so on our timetable and not theirs?

Demanding that an eighteen year old develop a life plan, right now, this minute, or else, is just rank foolishness. To demand a commitment to that plan, right now, that involves a commitment to give up a year or spend a ton of money or both-- also foolish. And I don't even know how to stop goggling at the idea that people who won't go to college or learn a trade should go become cannon fodder in a foreign land.

But to attach such high stakes is the worst, particularly since three of the four options require someone to accept the student. Is the army not recruiting? Can they not afford a four year college? Do they lack the skills for a trade? And are they not really geared for a path that lead through community college? Well, too bad, because now they have a double strike against them-- no plan yet, and no diploma, either.

And as many commentators have noted, the slashing of guidance counselors from many Chicago schools (not the rich ones, of course) leaves students with even fewer resources to meet this new demand.

Rahm's goal of making education K-14 may or may not be a worthy one, but this is a terrible way to go about it, a method that ignores the diversity both of student talents and the different timelines along which we all grow. This is the kind of paternalistic top-down thinking that gives us, "Well, I think all these kids are making a mistake, so I'll just make them do what I want. I know what's best for them-- I will make them do it." No more freedom of choice for you, because you're not doing it right!

It's bad policy that comes from bad impulses and will yield bad results. But congratulations class of 2020-- it's your future. Just one more reasons that mayors should never, ever, be put in charge of public school systems.

8 comments:

  1. I have been saying it for years: Chicago is a tragedy. No one can do anything about it. Hopefully this latest charade will not be enacted. What disrespect to the students! Utter disrespect!

    ReplyDelete
  2. What happens when the trade school, the community college, or the university admission policy requires proof of graduation in order for the student to be give an acceptance letter? Am I missing something, or is this the stupidest, least thought through idea ever conceived? Sound like a Catch-22 waiting to happen.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Traditional colleges send out acceptance letters long before students graduate, so this is not a concern when it comes to colleges and universities at least.

      Delete
  3. You didn't miss anything. There is so much that is illogical in Chicago. That's why I cannot imagine anything will ever improve. I hope I am dead wrong. Again, who suffers? Children. Young people trying to find their way in the world. People are moving out of Chicago into the nearby suburbs to get in a different school district. They are even willing to pay higher taxes for those schools (as they are believers in public education, taxes for education, etc.) We can all see what is going on here and connect the dots for ourselves.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Until the powers that be address the economic distress of the mostly minority underclass located in the inner city ghettos they created, the needle will never budge. My guess is that trying to move the underclass onto the so-called elevator to the middle class is not even a goal much less a priority. There is too much money to be made pretending.

      Delete
  4. Isn't this a little like working all week and being told on Friday you can't have your check unless you submit your (APPROVED) plans for the weekend???

    ReplyDelete
  5. A military recruiter told me years ago that the technological know-how and abilities for all personnel, including the private, are such that not only is a diploma necessary for enlistment, but the young person must pass a math test that requires a knowledge of Algebra 1. If you can't do the algebra, the military doesn't want you.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. It is certainly true that graduating from high school no longer necessarily means that you can usefully be part of the military of the country.

      I think the first step in this discussion should be to think about what it means to graduate from high school.

      Delete